|
 As Holt glosses it: "this is a book
about the work of genre categories in American popular music" (p. 1). In
part the book is a theorization of genre as a site of cultural practice, and
in part a series of case studies. Holt's own goals relative to the existing
literature are to "bring genre scholarship closer to musical practice and
experience," and also to understand music genres "in the totality of social
space" (p. 7). He adopts the term genre culture "as a concept for the
overall identity of the cultural formations in which a genre is constituted"
(p. 19). And given the complexity of social space, Holt feels that "the best
way to [study genre] is not to develop an all-encompassing master theory,
[but rather to] employ multiple critical models, explore plural narratives,
and develop 'small theories' in relation to particular musical and social
realities in a series of individually designed case studies" (pp. 7-8).
Although existing studies of genre in popular music are not numerous, they
have tended to be influential. This is in part because the concept of genre
does so much cultural work. For example, as summarized by Holt, genre is a
central concept underlying bourgeois aesthetics, structures of difference in
signification, the creation and maintenance of social networks and
individual identities, the negotiation of power and authority in social
discourses, and the organization of industry, to name just a few. However,
despite the many ways in which concepts of genre have been highlighted in
particular studies, few extended theories of musical genre are currently
available. Reflecting on this, Holt points out some of the reasons that it
is difficult to create theories of genre in music, which include: the
diverse sites of musical production, the ambiguous and polysemic nature of
musical signification, and a strong suspiciousness regarding categories and
categorization among many popular music scholars.
Given such a scenario, Holt's book is poised to make two contributions. One
is the development of a theoretical toolkit as describe above, centered on
the fluid and pragmatic concept of genre cultures. The second is to add
further detailed case studies to the existing literature on genre. Although
I will quibble with some details, on balance Holt succeeds enough on both
fronts to make his work required reading not only for those interested in
the problematic of genre, but also for those interested more generally in
American music, the ethnography of popular music cultures, and the
historiography of rock, country music, and jazz.
In practice, the concept of genre cultures allows Holt to move fluidly
through a wide range of historical and ethnographic topics. As preparation,
chapter one is devoted to developing a general theory of genre, although
Holt often proceeds by seeming to assume an intuitive or commonsense meaning
for the term, allowing him to focus mostly on how genre functions as part of
broader cultural frameworks. The lack of a definition for genre as such is
not accidental: one of Holt's key claims is that the complex cultural work
associated with genre, along with the multiplicity of sites in which it is
active, assure that genre is not a single or simple concept amenable to
definition. Although Holt gives convincing reasons for adopting a fluid and
pragmatic theoretical attitude, I can't help feeling that he has more to say
theoretically than he has allowed himself. The concept of genre cultures is
enormously suggestive. However, at times the focus seems a little too broad,
because Holt does not provide any detailed discussion of exactly how genre
as a cultural category differs from other categories, especially closely
related concepts such as style. The strength of his approach is that it
shows in depth how genre concepts mesh with a wide range of cultural
practices, but I find myself wishing for more discussion of their
specificity. One result of this is that often the relevance of genre as a
concept in the case studies is left implicit, rather than fully explored.
This might not present a problem for attentive and generous readers, since
in every case it is possible and enlightening to link up the specific
historical and ethnographic details with general features of genre theory.
But it would have been helpful if these links were more frequently spelled
out.
The case studies themselves are all useful, and the best ones are major
contributions. Perhaps the most significant and original are his study of
the relationship between jazz and rock in the early fusion era (chapter
four), and an extended ethnography centered on Jeff Parker and the
experimental jazz scene in Chicago (chapters five and six). Some might
suggest that Holt's ethnography could be a little thicker, but it is
nonetheless effective in identifying core issues within the scope defined by
the rest of the book. Interesting insights are also provided by Holt's study
of country music and the Nashville sound, which places special emphasis on
the 1950s and how country musicians in Nashville responded to early
rock'n'roll (chapter three). Here again, a critical reader might fault the
degree of detail, but I don't see this as a problem. Holt selects facts and
interview materials which bear closely upon particular questions of genre,
and at no time does he say anything which would throw his depth of overall
knowledge into doubt. For the most part, the case studies are expert and
just detailed enough to make their points, and those points are often
incisive. It is also impressive how confidently Holt moves between various
methodologies in the case studies (ethnographic, historical, and critical).
The other two case studies excited me less: chapter two on roots music,
Americana, and O Brother, Where Art Thou, and chapter seven, which presents
a more wide-ranging meditation on the relationship between music and borders
in U.S. history. This is not because there is anything particularly wrong
with these chapters--they are just a little less original than Holt's other
case studies.
In sum, Genre in Popular Music is an impressive contribution. If it leaves
me wanting more in some respects, that is only because Holt is so successful
with what he does present. The book succeeds in advancing the culturally
informed genre analysis of authors such as Frith and Negus into new
territory, and should be consulted by anyone interested in genre, or in
popular music studies more generally. |
|